Archeologists working in the Guatemalan rainforest
have discovered an ancient mural room evidently used by Mayan scientists, on
which extensive calendrical calculations had been written. The newly discovered instances of Mayan
timekeeping are older than earlier calendars recovered from ruins of the
civilization – the ones that notoriously end after the thirteenth baktun, or
four hundred year cycle, and that convince some New Agey people that the world
is scheduled to end seven months and nine days from now, on December 21st,
2012.
Those expectations are ostensibly undercut by the
reporting on this new discovery of what you might think of as a beta version of
the super-long Mayan calendar. When the
coverage of this story proves not to change anything, though, I think it will
convey a worthwhile lesson about nature of people’s beliefs. The longer false information is reinforced,
the stronger the eventual revelation needs to be to push people to the breaking
point of abandoning irrational ideas.
This Mayan calendar speculation has been going on
for so long that there are certainly people out there who accept its credence
even though they know nothing about the context of Mayan timekeeping, or even
about the Mayan civilization in general.
It’s common knowledge, or rather common bullshit, to the extent that it’s
been used without explanation in recent ad campaigns. Of course, that same fact indicates that
people are immune to the reference. By
and large, they either reject it out of hand without having to argue the point
anymore, or they accept it but have accepted it for so long that waiting for
the end of days has become about as engaging as waiting for one’s number to be
called at the DMV.
People can become absolutely committed to the
craziest beliefs just by virtue of proximity and repetition. As somebody who’s been prone to a good deal
of mythological thinking and esotericism myself, I don’t rush to judge the
so-called Mayan calendar prophecy as crazy or stupid, but it is pretty well divorced
from anything that could be construed as objective fact. Speculation isn’t an intellectual crime, per
se, just as long as you recognize that you’re speculating and that it won’t
take much additional evidence to discount your ideas altogether.
That’s what a lot of people don’t understand, and
it is a serious problem for the entire belief structure and process of rationality
in the minds of some people who are otherwise capable of great
intelligence. I’m certain that some such
people still think that the world might end on the winter solstice, and I’m
equally certain that the mere fact that their sole piece of evidence for that
has been directly refuted by the same 3000 year-old dead civilization that had
been the source of it in the first place.
Breaking points are by their very nature hard
things to reach on one’s own, and much harder to bring about in others. That’s what makes them either so damaging or so
satisfying, depending on the outcome.
That’s also why they ought to be confined to matters of principle or
behavior or ideology, and not factual information. It is an unfortunate complication to rational
dialogue when the breaking point for one’s genuine understanding is pushed back
by the fact that he insists on stubbornly clinging to beliefs that were based
on pure speculation in absence of the factual data that is to become available
later.
In this sense, I’m looking forward to a sort of
meta breaking point in social psychological trends, one that encourages people
to dispense with their need for a breaking point in issues of pure fact. Fact, theory, speculation, and opinion all
need to be relegated to their own spheres.
If any significant number of people persist in conflating those
categories so much that they believe that recurrent speculation is knowledge,
it is that much more difficult for the public to have effective discussions
about opinions that can’t be outright disproven but can – and should – be broken.
No comments:
Post a Comment